I love your point of view but I think genetic testing at birth plays right into their future plans. They cannot be trusted with that information and what would it be used for anyway? If there's a situation where they want to do an implant or something of that nature, then and only then should genetic testing for that be done IMO. No sane person allows anyone, let alone a white coat assassin, to stick needles filled with poisons into their babies. There is no genetic test that should give permission to do such an anti-health thing to a child but neither an adult. I'm so sorry you were pressured into having that implant and hope you can find someone to remove it for you. In the meantime, bless you for taking the time and energy to investigate and to share your findings. You are an important part of creating solutions to what we have now, which is completely out of control.
That’s right, only insane people would allow neurotoxins to be injected into their baby and there’s lots of them. Inefficient detoxers will become hypersensitised to the aluminium neurotoxin(which is why they get ASD and others don’t) and genetic testing at birth would prevent that more than half the population are inefficient detoxers and discriminating against them based on their genetics is not legal.
So genetic testing at birth would prevent these inefficient detoxers becoming hypersensitive to a neurotoxin at birth and would not get asd. It could then be noted on their file that no foreign objects are to be put in their body and if they need dental fillings, they must be metal free ceramics.
I recommend you read the research by prof Vera Stejskal as genetic testing at birth is the only way that ASD rates will stop climbing.
It seems like you're missing my point though. I understand perfectly what you're saying. Just because some kids 'seem' to be able to handle non-stop injections, it doesn't mean they are not piling up only to cause problems later in life - no one does the studies so no one knows. Why inject children in the first place? Can we not use the knowledge we have to just stop it with the injections? Adding genetic testing at birth is just another tool FOR the industry. You gotta know they're never going to stop injecting because they know it's not a healthy thing to do - it's part of an agenda and if we don't recognize that it's like spitting into the wind. Hoping the industry will respond positively to clear thinking and analyses is a lost cause. They don't care Mark - they honestly don't care and really do not want to stand up against pharma in any way, shape or form. You say "genetic testing at birth is the only way ASD rates will stop climbing." I say they would also stop climbing if we just stopped with shooting neurotoxic trash into baby bodies. See how easy that would be? Then we aren't giving the medical mafia genetic material to do more harm with.
But they will never stop injecting neurotoxins into us. They will never stop putting neurotoxins in the food and water supply and will never stop putting neurotoxic dental fillings in our mouths They will never admit vaccines cause ASD. And most of the public are under their drs spell. Genetic testing isn’t injecting anything into someone and the pharmaceutical industry would make sure it never happens as it would highlight how vaccines are indeed the cause of autism. Most people won’t stop injecting their children with vaccines due to the propaganda which will lead to more crime and societal breakdown eventually. I have a familial gene mutation. I didn’t need testing. Every kennard related to the Pennsylvania kennards have it so it’s not rare to be an inefficient detoxer. We are in the majority
Yes, I understand. So that's where you're coming from - since they're never going to admit things or stop with the jabbing, at least give some people a hard 'out' with the testing?
You probably don’t need genetic testing in your family. Your family history is a good indication you’re family are inefficient detoxers so all you need to do is avoid foreign objects and metals
My mom had titanium hardware in her back about 25 years ago for chronic back pain. About a year later all the hardware was removed as she had new calcium deposits around the hardware that increased her pain. Does that indicate she was an inefficient detoxifier? When we need to drive more than few minutes, I use frozen ice packs for my pain relief. Heat always feels good but ice is better for my pain.
Osseointegration is seen by surgeons as a good thing, but what it actually is, is the bone trying to isolate the implant from the body by surrounding it in bone as it’s a foreign object.
Not necessarily. It sounds more like osseointegration which is supposed to happen, happened to your mum, but it lead to implant failure as it caused pain. Whether she got systemic problems as well like malfunctions of the autonomic system is evidence of being an inefficient detoxer.
Although it’s not profitable in New Zealand. Ours is a socialist health system. Govt pays and pay a fortune. It’s their biggest cost. If they started genetically testing everyone at birth they could make the health system a lot cheaper than it is now.
I'm not sure that's really the answer. Socialist systems are about stealing money from taxpayers/slaves and giving it to the authority class which can, in turn, be controlled.
I didn’t say it was the answer to anything. You imagined that bit. It represents everything that’s wrong with the nz health system. Over 500,000 nz citizens cannot access any appropriate healthcare at all because it’s a socialist system. And we can’t even sue drs. I would much rather have the USA health system in nz, at least I would be able to get help as in nz it’s not legal to investigate adverse events but in America patients can order tests that prove the adverse event. Unlike nz
Ok, I'm starting to get the picture. But to be fair you absolutely did say genetic testing at birth is the answer to cutting costs which is the important bit apparently.
It is the answer to cutting health costs. If people don’t trigger the disease process, they don’t need healthcare which is paid for by the taxpayer. You may find this interesting. I’ve had to reverse the disease process many times in my life by simply removing the metals from the body that caused the disease process to be triggered
With their corporate priority being to make money regardless, they will find a way to screw any novel approach up. Guaranteed. Your solution doesn't reside in some highly touted concoction. Just stay away from the "health" care industry!
I love your point of view but I think genetic testing at birth plays right into their future plans. They cannot be trusted with that information and what would it be used for anyway? If there's a situation where they want to do an implant or something of that nature, then and only then should genetic testing for that be done IMO. No sane person allows anyone, let alone a white coat assassin, to stick needles filled with poisons into their babies. There is no genetic test that should give permission to do such an anti-health thing to a child but neither an adult. I'm so sorry you were pressured into having that implant and hope you can find someone to remove it for you. In the meantime, bless you for taking the time and energy to investigate and to share your findings. You are an important part of creating solutions to what we have now, which is completely out of control.
That’s right, only insane people would allow neurotoxins to be injected into their baby and there’s lots of them. Inefficient detoxers will become hypersensitised to the aluminium neurotoxin(which is why they get ASD and others don’t) and genetic testing at birth would prevent that more than half the population are inefficient detoxers and discriminating against them based on their genetics is not legal.
So genetic testing at birth would prevent these inefficient detoxers becoming hypersensitive to a neurotoxin at birth and would not get asd. It could then be noted on their file that no foreign objects are to be put in their body and if they need dental fillings, they must be metal free ceramics.
I recommend you read the research by prof Vera Stejskal as genetic testing at birth is the only way that ASD rates will stop climbing.
It seems like you're missing my point though. I understand perfectly what you're saying. Just because some kids 'seem' to be able to handle non-stop injections, it doesn't mean they are not piling up only to cause problems later in life - no one does the studies so no one knows. Why inject children in the first place? Can we not use the knowledge we have to just stop it with the injections? Adding genetic testing at birth is just another tool FOR the industry. You gotta know they're never going to stop injecting because they know it's not a healthy thing to do - it's part of an agenda and if we don't recognize that it's like spitting into the wind. Hoping the industry will respond positively to clear thinking and analyses is a lost cause. They don't care Mark - they honestly don't care and really do not want to stand up against pharma in any way, shape or form. You say "genetic testing at birth is the only way ASD rates will stop climbing." I say they would also stop climbing if we just stopped with shooting neurotoxic trash into baby bodies. See how easy that would be? Then we aren't giving the medical mafia genetic material to do more harm with.
But they will never stop injecting neurotoxins into us. They will never stop putting neurotoxins in the food and water supply and will never stop putting neurotoxic dental fillings in our mouths They will never admit vaccines cause ASD. And most of the public are under their drs spell. Genetic testing isn’t injecting anything into someone and the pharmaceutical industry would make sure it never happens as it would highlight how vaccines are indeed the cause of autism. Most people won’t stop injecting their children with vaccines due to the propaganda which will lead to more crime and societal breakdown eventually. I have a familial gene mutation. I didn’t need testing. Every kennard related to the Pennsylvania kennards have it so it’s not rare to be an inefficient detoxer. We are in the majority
Yes, I understand. So that's where you're coming from - since they're never going to admit things or stop with the jabbing, at least give some people a hard 'out' with the testing?
The health (sick) system goes for profit, not speed. Healing is not profitable. Surgery is profitable.
You probably don’t need genetic testing in your family. Your family history is a good indication you’re family are inefficient detoxers so all you need to do is avoid foreign objects and metals
My mom had titanium hardware in her back about 25 years ago for chronic back pain. About a year later all the hardware was removed as she had new calcium deposits around the hardware that increased her pain. Does that indicate she was an inefficient detoxifier? When we need to drive more than few minutes, I use frozen ice packs for my pain relief. Heat always feels good but ice is better for my pain.
Osseointegration is seen by surgeons as a good thing, but what it actually is, is the bone trying to isolate the implant from the body by surrounding it in bone as it’s a foreign object.
Not necessarily. It sounds more like osseointegration which is supposed to happen, happened to your mum, but it lead to implant failure as it caused pain. Whether she got systemic problems as well like malfunctions of the autonomic system is evidence of being an inefficient detoxer.
Although it’s not profitable in New Zealand. Ours is a socialist health system. Govt pays and pay a fortune. It’s their biggest cost. If they started genetically testing everyone at birth they could make the health system a lot cheaper than it is now.
I'm not sure that's really the answer. Socialist systems are about stealing money from taxpayers/slaves and giving it to the authority class which can, in turn, be controlled.
I didn’t say it was the answer to anything. You imagined that bit. It represents everything that’s wrong with the nz health system. Over 500,000 nz citizens cannot access any appropriate healthcare at all because it’s a socialist system. And we can’t even sue drs. I would much rather have the USA health system in nz, at least I would be able to get help as in nz it’s not legal to investigate adverse events but in America patients can order tests that prove the adverse event. Unlike nz
Ok, I'm starting to get the picture. But to be fair you absolutely did say genetic testing at birth is the answer to cutting costs which is the important bit apparently.
It is the answer to cutting health costs. If people don’t trigger the disease process, they don’t need healthcare which is paid for by the taxpayer. You may find this interesting. I’ve had to reverse the disease process many times in my life by simply removing the metals from the body that caused the disease process to be triggered
🎯.
Thank you.
With their corporate priority being to make money regardless, they will find a way to screw any novel approach up. Guaranteed. Your solution doesn't reside in some highly touted concoction. Just stay away from the "health" care industry!