The obvious danger of foreign objects in the body, whether they be shrapnel from war, or an implant from your surgeon.

The signs are blatantly obvious

If you ask your surgeon whether the implant they plan on putting in you is safe, they will say yes, of course.

But is this reliable information that we can trust?

To find the answer to this question, we must look at how the immune system reacts to the foreign object or implant.

When shrapnel or metal fragments are left in the body, the immune system gets to work building a capsule around them, in an attempt to isolate them from the body.

This also happens with breast implants, and when they are removed, the capsule should also be removed, along with the breast implant.

When implants, like titanium lumbar spine implants are implanted into the body, the immune system starts to isolate it from the body by covering it in bone. Eventually, given enough time, it will totally enclose the implant completely in bone, to isolate it from the rest of the body.

It is very obvious from these reactions alone, that the immune system sees the implant or metal fragments as a threat to wellbeing, otherwise it wouldn’t bother, as it would see the implant as “self.”

The process of building the capsule, whether it be bone or fibrous tissue, is a big job, and the process alone, will keep immune resources busy. This means we don’t have the full complement of immune resources, to protect us from other threats in our environment. We become more susceptible to disease processes.

By forming a protective capsule, the immune system is doing what it is supposed to do. It is attempting to protect the body from a foreign object, so this is a good thing.

The fact the immune system reacts this way, is a sure sign of the threat that implants are to human health. Its best to avoid the need for an implant in the first place. Make surgery the last resort, not the first and only choice.

My 2019 surgery was for a horizontal fracture in my spine, at L4. The scan also showed oedema associated with it. It just would not heal, as every time I bent over to pick up my groceries, I would feel the fracture separate again, it was very painful.

The only option I was given was surgery, using an implant to stabilise it until it healed. Thinking back, and knowing what I now know, I would rather have spent the next few years lying down, and working on rebuilding bone around the fracture. Eating lots of beef fat and nurturing my spine back to good health.

The health sector however, always goes for the quick fix, to get you on your feet and back to work faster, and to use less resources in doing so.

Lying flat on your back for a few years, unable to look after yourself requires 24/7 care. A hard thing to find in this day and age, and a very expensive thing to have to pay for. Sometimes though, based on the patients genetic profile, it is the best thing to do, as some genetic profiles cannot tolerate foreign objects in the body.

Ignoring this leads to many more hospital resources being required, whether they be used for further surgery to remove the implant, or used to try and deny the implant is responsible for the ongoing health issues.

In my multiple experiences, resources being used to deny the implant is causing problems, is par for the course, and the health system is more than happy to keep spending much more money to protect the reputation of the medical device manufacturers than it would cost to remove the implant and return the patient to good health.

This is because allopathic doctors aren’t allowed to look for cause. They aren’t allowed to assume the implant may be causing the issues, so instead, they do what they are trained to do, and look for a way to treat the systemic symptoms the patient is experiencing, without implicating the implant or the surgeon that put it there. Even when it’s obvious what’s going on.

This is akin to injecting a patient with poison, and then ignoring the poison as the cause of the poisoning symptoms the patient starts suffering from.

We’ve seen this same thing with the genetically modified modRNA injection over the last few years. They injected the willing population with poison, and then ignored it as a possible cause for the bad effects it caused.

We’ve also seen the same behaviour of our doctors, with traditional vaccines. I certainly have over the last 38 years, I had many adverse events to the aluminium in them from the ages of 14 to 30, until it became impossible to deny.

But even so, they still denied it outright. They didn’t care how incompetent it made them look, because the official word from the health authorities is that vaccines are safe.

The immune system doesn’t like having foreign objects put in it, and I include things like vaccines in this category. We also know that some people are more susceptible than others due to their genetic profile. These people are known as inefficient detoxers. The mthfr variants are examples.

The FDA immunology panel, set up to investigate the biological responses to metals used in orthopaedic implants a few years ago, couldn’t help but admit that there is a subset of the population who are susceptible to the metals used in orthopaedic implants, because it’s so obvious.

We know who the people are who will have the bad systemic reactions to implants, with genetic testing. Genetic testing to identify these patients before they have implant surgery would avoid a predictable adverse reaction. These patients, with their genetic variance, need to be given a different option.

They should not be led by the surgeons hand into a life of systemic illness which will eventually kill them after years of suffering.

It’s the same with adverse reactions to the metals in vaccines. Those who got autism or adhd from their childhood vaccinations didn’t have to, and if they had genetic testing before any vaccines were administered, their doctors would have seen that they are inefficient detoxers and that vaccines are contraindicated for this subset of the population.

That is, if only doctors and surgeons were taught about this, but doctors and surgeons are trained to believe that every human reacts the same way to pharmaceutical products and devices, regardless of genetic variance, and if they have been deemed safe, then they are safe for everyone. It is also important to know, that orthopaedic implants undergo no human testing.

Doctors and surgeons are a leading cause of death in the west. Compulsory genetic testing at birth would change this outcome and we would have less chronic sickness in the world. The million dollar question, is why aren’t they doing so.

The answer to this question is simple. Like mushrooms, they are kept in the dark and fed bullshit by the pharmaceutical industry.

I hope that one day, healthcare will be provided differently, depending on a patients genetic variances, as this will put an end to adverse events. For this to occur, the pharmaceutical industries capture of health regulatory agencies, politicians and medical schools will have to be remedied.

Big Pharma will fight tooth and nail to stop this change occurring as the public would finally see how much harm they have caused the public in the past, and this could put an end to their profiteering from disease that their products created in the first place.

The only way change will occur, is if the public demand it, and don’t take no for an answer, even if that means toppling their own captured governments.

Revolution is our only saviour from the sickness and death that big pharma have propagated across society and it’s time to take out the trash!

Blessings to the revolutionaries, who see what the unconscious masses choose to ignore.