The Virus Debate - Both Sides are Wrong

Those who choose sides choose Intellectual stagnation

When it comes to the science of viruses, most people think that the science is settled and there is no debate.

But this is not so. There is a lot of debate in science with regards to viruses including what they actually are and whether they are actually responsible for disease at all.

What we first need to do, is establish what the paradigm of allopathic medicine actually is.

Allopathic medicine is an industry

All the terms they use, are only specific to the paradigm of the allopathic medical industry and not the wider reality.

The terms they come up with to describe differing sets of symptoms of bad health, are their interpretation of what they believe is occurring with their patients health.

Another different medical industry, like environmental medicine, may describe symptoms of bad health a completely different way and they would also have different names for different sets of symptoms than the allopathic medicine industry.

Medical science is an attempt to describe reality, but that doesn’t mean they are successful. Being an industry, it is up to the public whether they think allopathic medicine have got things right and whether they are the best people to consult on healthcare or not.

Currently, there is a lot of debate as to whether allopathic medical science are correct about what they term a seasonal virus.

This article is an attempt to show you that both sides of the debate are wrong, and that emotions have taken over logic in this debate.

If we take a step back and observe the dynamics in the strategies of each side of the debate, what we see is that both sides think they are smarter than the other side and are basically just finger pointing, name-calling and screaming while having their hands clasped firmly over their ears.

This is evidence of frustration by both sides of the debate that neither are able to prove what they are claiming. If they could, there would be no need for name-calling, so what we can say for sure is that neither side have confidence in their own arguments.

With most debates where there are two firm beliefs that seem totally opposed to each other, I’ve noticed that the answer invariably turns out to either be a mixture of the two ideas, or that both sides have completely missed the point, and the answer is something completely different to what either side is promoting.

With regards to the debate on the existence of viruses, I believe it’s both.

Science is the process of attempting to provide empirical explanations for the world around us and the phenomena we come across in life. It is not reality, but an attempt to describe reality and the workings of the natural world.

What humans have noticed from the dawn of time, is that occasionally we get symptoms of bad health that have come to be known in allopathic medical science as a flu or virus. These are symptoms that the public claim they are only affected by, if they come into contact with someone already exhibiting these symptoms.

The symptoms of this mysterious seasonal illness, which people appear to only contract from others who are symptomatic, do not appear to be part of the normal disease process that comes with aging and precedes death

So the role of science in this instance is to investigate the public’s concerns about this mystery seasonal illness and to provide empirical answers to what is actually occurring

What the allopathic medical industry have come up with for their explanation, is that these seasonal illnesses are caused by an external factor. They say these symptoms are caused by something they have termed a virus, and that coming into contact with this virus or someone symptomatic with the virus will also cause us to develop these symptoms.

On the other side of the debate, the symptoms of what we call a virus is just a normal immune system process that occurs regularly to detoxify the body. In this model it just appears as though we are catching the symptoms off someone else when it’s actually just coincidence.

The proponents of this side of the debate, claim there is no such thing as a contagious respiratory illness at all.

Their logic, is that because allopathic medical science have been unsuccessful at infecting a healthy person, with a virus they have isolated from a symptomatic person, that it must mean the allopathic theory of a contagious illness has been disproven and that there is no such thing as a contagious virus that’s causing these symptoms.

But is this logic, or is it a logic trap?

Since when has the absence of evidence, been regarded as evidence of absence.

Claiming that just because someone has been unsuccessful at measuring something, it proves the non-existence of what they were attempting to measure, is nonsensical, ignorant and short-sighted don’t you think?

On the other side of the debate, thinking a deadly contagious virus is going to make us sick and kill us all when allopathic science can’t even take the virus from a sick person and infect a healthy person is similarly nonsensical, ignorant and shortsighted.

What those involved in this argument seem to assume, is that one side is right and the other is wrong. It hasn’t even crossed their mind that their may be a third option to explain this seasonal mystery set of symptoms that have been reported since antiquity.

Instead of being focussed on providing empirical evidence to explain the phenomena of seasonal flu like symptoms, they are just focussing on trying to prove they are right and not wrong. This is not science!

Most of my life I’ve been having surgeries or recovering from systemic chronic illness caused by the antigens in medical devices and treatments that I’ve had adverse reactions to. I have even had the flu like symptoms of acute mercury toxicity in the past, caused by a galvanic reaction between a titanium alloy lumbar implant and my amalgam fillings

Even 9 years after my amalgam fillings were removed, I still had toxic levels of mercury in my blood.

So I certainly know what the flu like symptoms of acute mercury toxicity feel like. I also know that chronic illness caused by antigens do not manifest as flu like symptoms, but as the systemic symptoms of a hyper immune response. A struggling immune system.

All my health issues throughout life have been caused by the effects of toxins and antigens, and every time Ive been able to remove those toxins or antigens to reverse the disease process and recover.

So I have huge personal experience with toxicity and chronic disease and in reversing, not just treating the symptoms of disease. I’m well experienced in the aging and disease process of the human body as I’ve had it triggered many times and reversed it many times.

My experiences show me that the best way to think of a virus is as a contagious trigger antigen, not the cause of flu like symptoms, but the trigger.

During our everyday lives we are exposed to many antigens. There are antigens in our foods as additives(often metals) or chemical residues, there’s antigens in the air we breathe in the form of metal nanoparticles and there are even metals in our drinking water.

For women there is a lot of metals in cosmetics and skin creams.

When we go to the dentist they put antigens in our mouths which contain metals and leak antigens into us, fillings, crowns and root canals. We may have medical procedures where surgical clips are left in us or bone cement or X-ray markers. They are all antigens.

So everyday, we can’t help but be exposed to antigens everywhere we look.

The problem is that they build up in our bodies over our lifetimes and this is why some people have no symptoms from a virus and some have severe symptoms.

It’s all to do with our toxic load and whether we are hypersensitive to our toxic load, or not.

If we are not hypersensitive to metals and have a low toxic load then we will have no symptoms from a virus.

If we have a high toxic load and are hypersensitive to the metals in our toxic load, then we will have severe symptoms and could die.

If you have a high toxic load built up, then the triggering of the hard detox process will also try and remove those toxins from the body at the same time as it does the virus. This gets your toxic load moving into your blood and around your organs and you will get severe “virus symptoms”.

If you are young and fit and have no significant gene mutations then you won’t have a big toxic load, as your body is able to get rid of it daily. You will likely have no symptoms if you contract a “virus.”

What allopathic medical science call a virus, is from my observations just the trigger antigen. It triggers the body into a hard detox process which mobilises the built up toxins causing the flu like symptoms of acute toxicity.

But to say that this is a normal process that just randomly occurs without being triggered by an external contagious factor cannot be true. I have such a high toxic load that if it was a normal regular yearly process of the body to rid itself of toxins, I would be getting flu symptoms every winter, but I’m not.

I’m able to avoid developing flu symptoms every year by avoiding coming into contact with others who are displaying the symptoms of flu.

It is a very rare occurrence for me to get the flu even though I have a very high toxic load because of my isolation. Being able to avoid triggering flu like symptoms each winter suggests there is definitely an external trigger for them that I am avoiding somehow.

The only thing I’m doing is to avoid other people who are already suffering flu type symptoms.

So what I am saying is the virus (which is the trigger) is contagious but whether you have symptoms or not is all down to your toxic load and your hypersensitivity to it.

The virus is the trigger and not the cause.

Knowing this information, it’s very clear to see who in society is susceptible and what we can all do to ensure that if we come into contact with what allopathic medicine call a virus, we will have no symptoms or only mild symptoms.

Everyday we must ensure that we are not being exposed to more antigens than our body can efficiently handle.

If you have no toxic load buildup you are at no risk from respiratory viruses like covid or flu. You will have no symptoms

With seasonal respiratory viruses, it’s not the virus that is dangerous, it’s our own toxic loads that are the threat, and our hypersensitivity to them. What allopathic medicine call a virus is just what triggers the hard detox process

Avoid being exposed to the trigger, and you will avoid getting the flu like symptoms.

The virus debate on Substack has lost all scientific rigour because proponents of both sides have put their entire credibility on the line by supporting one side of the debate or the other. It’s become a question of them being right or wrong so it’s devolved into an abusive argument.

I am here to tell you that both sides are wrong and should both be ignored

They have put limits on their scientific curiosity because they thought they found the answer they were looking for.

But science is not about finding the answers we were looking for, they are about finding empirical evidence to describe the world around us. Those who have put all their faith into the non-existence of contagion when they have no evidence of its non-existence have painted themselves into a corner with the abandonment of their intellectual curiosity in favour of their current beliefs.

They have created a rod for their own back and have imprisoned themselves in a cage of intellectual stagnation where changing their mind will only invite scorn.

This is a position that all serious scientific minds seek to avoid at all costs as it is antithetical to sound scientific principles. The world is not black and white, but a veritable rainbow of possibilities.

Concentrating on only one or two theories while assuming none others exist is not an indicator of a broad intellectual capability but of intellectual stagnation, and now that the name-calling has begun, it is becoming very clear who has a broad intellectual capability, who were just pretending they did, and who it would be very wise to avoid listening to in future.