Mental illness is not real

Experienced GPs and psychiatrists are well aware it’s a rort.

To understand what mental illness is, you have to understand what the paradigm of allopathic medicine is, and the role of allopathic doctors.

All of the life sciences, including allopathic medicine, work within their own paradigm.

This paradigm describes who they are, what they do, and how they go about doing it. It describes their role, their systems and processes, and how they respond to patient health complaints.

It’s the medical councils job to ensure that doctors stay within the paradigm of allopathic medicine to retain continuity of care across the industry.

Being an industry, we can’t have doctors across the country deciding to treat patients health concerns however they please, as this could cause confusion among the public, and could also bring the industry into disrepute.

The messaging we receive in New Zealand from government, the health authorities, and state media, is that the role of allopathic doctors is to investigate the cause of disease, to diagnose it, and to cure it.

We are also led to believe that allopathic doctors are trained in healthcare, and that the advice they give us reflects the latest research on human health and any emerging threats to our health.

The messaging we receive gives us expectations, that should for example, the fertiliser factory across the road, or the next door neighbour spraying pesticide on their garden harm our health, that our dr would alert us to this. While this may sound like common sense to most, when placed under scrutiny, nothing could be further from the truth.

So why are we being told these things?

The role of allopathic doctors is to practice medicine - not health. They are not allowed to investigate the cause of disease as that is not their role. Nor are they allowed to cure disease, as that is not their role either.

The role of doctors who work in the paradigm of allopathic medicine is to simply, treat symptoms of disease or injury with pharmaceutical interventions. That’s it.

They also do not reflect or represent the latest in medical science, as not all medical science fits into the paradigm of allopathic medicine.

All medical science in which cause is required to be investigated is completely ignored.

That in which cause is investigated, fits into the paradigm of environmental medicine instead. Toxicologists are an example of an environmental medicine doctor.

Environmental medicine focuses on environmental causes of disease, which means anything we may come into contact with, in our environment. This can range from pesticides we may be exposed to, or metals, or even to pharmaceutical and dental products.

It is also the role of environmental medicine doctors to investigate and treat neurotoxic reactions, but in New Zealand, environmental medicine drs are effectively outlawed.

As allopathic doctors are not allowed to investigate the cause of any symptoms, they don’t have the power or capabilities to investigate neurotoxic reactions. If you go into a hospital in New Zealand complaining of a neurotoxic reaction, they will send you away. They cannot help you.

The authorities cant just ignore the symptoms of people who are having a neurotoxic reaction though. They have to explain it somehow. They could deal with the problem by hiring a bunch of toxicologists to deal with these cases, but this would implicate industry and create huge compensation issues that the New Zealand Government would be liable for.

Allopathic medicine required a way to treat these people that fits within the paradigm of allopathic medicine. A way to treat the symptoms of a neurotoxic reaction, without investigating the cause of the symptoms, to save the government from liability.

Mental illness therefore, is the allopathic medical term for the symptoms of a neurotoxic reaction.

This is why hospitals in New Zealand will send you away without help if you turn up complaining of a neurotoxic reaction.

They will only help you, if you call the symptoms mental illness, because they require you to consent to the rort, before they put you on inappropriate, and neurotoxic, medications.

Counselling, which is even more inappropriate for a neurotoxic reaction, is akin to institutional brainwashing by the state.

In New Zealand, there is an extra incentive to never allow a neurotoxic reaction to be investigated or diagnosed, and that is because we have the Accident Compensation Corporation(ACC).

The Accident Compensation Corporation is the govt dept that pays lump sum compensation to citizens who have been harmed by industry. Any industry. 

So the government is liable. That’s why New Zealanders had their right to sue taken away from them when ACC was being implemented, because the government took over liability for the health harms caused by industry.

That’s also why you can’t get an appointment with a toxicologist in New Zealand. Environmental medicine has effectively been outlawed.

That’s also why you can’t order certain blood tests in nz. Especially not an LTT test which tests for hypersensitivity reactions to things like pharmaceutical and dental products that might be causing a neurotoxic reaction.

The whole system is set up so that no one in the country is allowed to investigate harm caused by industry, or provide tests that would allow people to identify the cause of their symptoms.

While GPs and psychiatrists don’t begin their career knowing that mental illness is just their term to manage neurotoxic reactions, they certainly figure it out with experience.

It becomes a source of great guilt and moral injury, with the many young lives they have ruined with this rort, piling up on their conscience.

One of the tactics that GPs use to morally justify sending someone to a psychiatrist is to wait for the patient to call their symptoms ‘mental illness’ first. They can then tell themselves it was the patients choice to go down that path, and their conscience is clear.

Mental illness is not real. It only exists within the paradigm of allopathic medicine and not the wider reality.

I would encourage everyone to immediately stop using the term, ‘mental illness,’ and to only refer to those symptoms as a neurotoxic reaction from now on.

If you refuse to call it mental illness and only use the term neurotoxicity, I guarantee you’ll find the reaction of your GP, very interesting.

Use of psychiatric terms by a patient signifies consent, and legitimacy where none exists, so these should be strictly avoided.

Never consent to the mental illness rort.

In earlier articles I have explained why some people are susceptible to becoming sensitive to neurotoxins and suffer symptoms of neurotoxicity. If investigated and treated appropriately, most neurotoxicity can be reversed very quickly and easily, so the patient can get on with their life.

The mental health industry that has sprung up to profit off the mental illness rort, now employs a lot of people, so any suggestion for change will be met with fierce opposition from those who rely on it to put food on their table.

It is only demand that legitimises it, and that demand only exists as it was manufactured dishonestly.

The increasing number of people suffering mental illness is a testament to the inappropriate management of neurotoxicity and is burdening society beyond breaking point.

There is no way the psychiatric industry will ever fix this situation as their reputations, power, and prosperity, will be trashed.

It is up to the public to help and rely on themselves, and each other, should their genetics make them susceptible to neurotoxins.

We must educate each other on the pathways available to seek remedy, as it’s only when the public abandon the mental illness rort, that this imaginary condition, will cease to exist.