Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anton's avatar

This is one of the most urgent conversations I’ve seen around the intersection of genetic susceptibility, environmental exposure, and public policy. Regardless of where one stands on specific medical claims, your core argument — that our systems are not designed to protect those with MTHFR or similar mutations — deserves serious attention. The connection to socioeconomic fallout (like unemployment, chronic illness, and incarceration) is deeply compelling and underexplored.

I’d love to see more empirical data or case studies backing these points, especially around how targeted interventions for the “susceptible subset” could shift public health outcomes and reduce systemic costs. If there are any studies you recommend, I’d be eager to read them.

Grateful for your fire and focus. This needs to be part of the wider healthcare conversation — not dismissed or ignored.

Expand full comment
JJ's avatar

Glyphosate is horrible for people with MTHFR. Is glyphosate illegal in New Zealand?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts